Discipline views
Rule adherence over time, and where it breaks.
The discipline score
The Discipline Score is the sum of your rule weights across evaluated rules, reported against the maximum your rules could award. The card shows the percentage and marks good discipline above eighty percent.
Underneath, two columns: Rules Followed and Rules Broken, each with the rule name, the detail, and its score contribution.
Because the score is built from your own weights, it is only as meaningful as those weights. If everything is set to twenty, the score cannot distinguish a serious violation from a trivial one. Spend ten minutes making the weights reflect what you actually care about and the number becomes useful.
If you see No rules defined in your strategy, there is nothing to score. Rules come first.
Where discipline breaks
Three panels answer different questions about failure.
Rule breaks is the detail view for one day: expand a rule, then click a break to see the actual value, the expected value, the rule variables, and the rule type, with a link to open the trade in the evaluator.
Rules broken most often ranks rules by failure rate across the range, showing failed against total checks and the resulting rate. This is the panel that tells you which rule is a genuine constraint and which is decoration. A rule failing eighty percent of the time is not a rule, it is a wish, and you should either change your behavior or change the rule and admit what you are actually doing.
Adherence by strategy revision plots adherence against each commit of your strategy, with the passed and failed counts per segment. This is where the commit discipline pays off: you can see whether the version of the plan you wrote in March was actually followed better than the version from January. The note on the panel reminds you to refresh analytics so trades get scored against each revision.
Also here: Daily process completion, described in the Process chapter, and Rule break frequency, which is the same ranking in chart form.